Shiffrin v. Beigel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shiffrin v. Beigel

3 A.D.2d 760, 160 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6278

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 760 (Shiffrin v. Beigel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shiffrin v. Beigel, 3 A.D.2d 760, 160 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution, pursuant to rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on condition that respondents file a note of issue for the next term of court. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution, pursuant to rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on condition that respondents file a note of issue for the next term of court. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 760, 160 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiffrin-v-beigel-nyappdiv-1957.