Shiffer v. Hudson Coal Co.
91 A. 886, 245 Pa. 479, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 901
Opinion
The facts in this case appear in the opinion of the court denying the motion for a new trial, and, for the reasons therein stated, the case was for the jury. We discover nothing in the assignments of error calling for its submission to another jury, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shiffer v. Hudson Coal Co., 91 A. 886, 245 Pa. 479, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 901 (Pa. 1914).
91 A. 886 (Shiffer v. Hudson Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greenough v. Colonial Colliery Co.
1 A.2d 174 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Mount Lookout Coal Co. v. Schooley
115 A. 822 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)