Shifer v. Kelmendi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shifer v. Kelmendi

248 A.D.2d 375, 669 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2189

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 375 (Shifer v. Kelmendi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shifer v. Kelmendi, 248 A.D.2d 375, 669 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose on a mortgage, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated November 26, 1996, which, inter alia, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $130,951.04.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s contention that the subject loan is criminally usurious has already been considered and rejected by prior decision and order of this Court dated May 2, 1994 (see, Shifer v .Kelmendi, 204 AD2d 300; cf., People v Williams, 188 AD2d 573).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Thompson, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI