Shietart v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Shietart v. City of Detroit

66 N.W. 221, 108 Mich. 309, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 973

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 18, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 66 N.W. 221 (Shietart v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shietart v. City of Detroit, 66 N.W. 221, 108 Mich. 309, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 973 (Mich. 1896).

Pincite

Opinions

Grant, J.

The city gave notice to lot owners to construct this sidewalk. All but one complied with the order. The sole ground of negligence upon which it is sought to hold the city liable is the failure to construct this Walk in front of this lot. The walk was in a sparsely settled part of the city. The ends of the walk opposite the open space were a few inches above the ground. We do not think the statute covers this case. In most cities and villages sidewalks are constructed with steps to the cross-walks and streets. There was no more danger in walking over this sidewalk than over those constructed so that travelers are compelled to frequently step up and down. The plaintiff safely stepped off the walk. He had no right to as[311]*311sume that there was no walk beyond higher than the ground. The sidewalk was not out of repair. It had not been built. We see no reason why a municipality should be held liable solely for a failure to construct a walk or a part thereof.

The judgment must be reversed, and no new trial ordered.

Long, J., concurred with Grant, J. McGrath, C. J., took no part in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant, J.

The city gave notice to lot owners to construct this sidewalk. All but one complied with the order. The sole ground of negligence upon which it is sought to hold the city liable is the failure to construct this Walk in front of this lot. The walk was in a sparsely settled part of the city. The ends of the walk opposite the open space were a few inches above the ground. We do not think the statute covers this case. In most cities and villages sidewalks are constructed with steps to the cross-walks and streets. There was no more danger in walking over this sidewalk than over those constructed so that travelers are compelled to frequently step up and down. The plaintiff safely stepped off the walk. He had no right to as[311]*311sume that there was no walk beyond higher than the ground. The sidewalk was not out of repair. It had not been built. We see no reason why a municipality should be held liable solely for a failure to construct a walk or a part thereof.

The judgment must be reversed, and no new trial ordered.

Long, J., concurred with Grant, J. McGrath, C. J., took no part in the decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 N.W. 221, 108 Mich. 309, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shietart-v-city-of-detroit-mich-1896.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack