Shiels v. Wortman

New York Supreme Court

Shiels v. Wortman

15 N.Y.S. 589, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 798, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 56

DecidedJuly 2, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 15 N.Y.S. 589 (Shiels v. Wortman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shiels v. Wortman, 15 N.Y.S. 589, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 798, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 56 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Pratt, J.

We see no reason bo change bhe opinion expressed upon the former argument of this appeal. 8 N. Y. Supp. 799. Ib seems clear that the ordinary bill of costs does not compensate defendants for the expenses imposed upon them by the action. Nor do we And any reason why the plaintiffs should not be held to the ordinary liability of litigants. The order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion may be renewed at special term. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratt, J.

We see no reason bo change bhe opinion expressed upon the former argument of this appeal. 8 N. Y. Supp. 799. Ib seems clear that the ordinary bill of costs does not compensate defendants for the expenses imposed upon them by the action. Nor do we And any reason why the plaintiffs should not be held to the ordinary liability of litigants. The order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion may be renewed at special term. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 N.Y.S. 589, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 798, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiels-v-wortman-nysupct-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack