Shields v. State

82 So. 3d 1029, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13739, 2011 WL 3819677
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shields v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6321
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 2011·No. No. 4D08-1710·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida moved for rehearing, having discovered the transcript of a “second proceeding” in this post-conviction case. The transcript reveals that the trial judge verbally announced his findings of fact and conclusions of law following the evidentiary hearing. Now that we have the complete record, we grant rehearing and Avithdraw our prior opinions in Shields v. State, 36 Fla. L. Weekly D2466 (Fla. 4th DCA July 6, 2011) and Shields v. State, 59 So.3d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). We substitute this opinion in place of those previously issued.

[1030]*1030Based on the record now before this court, the trial court’s orders in this case, summarily denying some of appellant’s claims and denying others following an evidentiary hearing, are affirmed.

Affirmed.

POLEN, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shields v. State, 82 So. 3d 1029, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13739, 2011 WL 3819677 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

82 So. 3d 1029 (Shields v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shields v. State
59 So. 3d 385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)