Shields v. Retirement Commission of Department of Administration

Supreme Court of Florida

Shields v. Retirement Commission of Department of Administration

368 So. 2d 590, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 5045

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 9, 1978·No. Nos. 53347, 53330·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After hearing argument in these consolidated cases, we find that no conflict exists between decisions as required for conflict certiorari jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and that the First District Court of Appeal did not inherently pass upon the constitutionality of Section 121.021(15), Florida Statutes.

Accordingly, the writ of certiorari is discharged, and the appeal is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After hearing argument in these consolidated cases, we find that no conflict exists between decisions as required for conflict certiorari jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and that the First District Court of Appeal did not inherently pass upon the constitutionality of Section 121.021(15), Florida Statutes.

Accordingly, the writ of certiorari is discharged, and the appeal is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., dissent.

Shields v. Retirement Commission of Department of Administration, 368 So. 2d 590, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 5045 (Fla. 1978).

Pincite

368 So. 2d 590 (Shields v. Retirement Commission of Department of Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related