Shields v. Betts
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 342
Opinion
The motions will have to be granted. The petitions in error were not filed until five months after the rendition of the judgments sought to be reversed, and, therefore, were not filed in time. It is true that they were filed within four months from the overruling of the motion for a new trial, but this is not sufficient. Dowty v. Pepple, 58 Ohio St., 395.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shields v. Betts, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 342 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 342 (Shields v. Betts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.