Shieldmark, Inc. v. Insite Solutions, LLC
This text of Shieldmark, Inc. v. Insite Solutions, LLC (Shieldmark, Inc. v. Insite Solutions, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
SHIELDMARK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INSITE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2014-1175, -1177 ______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in Nos. 1:12-cv-00223-DCN and 1:13-cv-00572-DCN, Judge Donald C. Nugent. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
W. SCOTT HARDERS, Brennan, Manna & Diamond, LLC, of Akron, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was MARTIN J. PANGRACE. Of counsel on the brief was MARK B. COHN, Dubyak Connick Thompson & Bloom, LLC, of Cleveland, Ohio.
RAY L. WEBER, Renner, Kenner, Greive, Bobak, Tay- lor, & Weber, of Akron, Ohio, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief was LAURA J. GENTILCORE. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, BRYSON, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 14, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shieldmark, Inc. v. Insite Solutions, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shieldmark-inc-v-insite-solutions-llc-cafc-2014.