Shiel v. State

576 So. 2d 931, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2647, 1991 WL 41010
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1239
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 576 So. 2d 931 (Shiel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shiel v. State, 576 So. 2d 931, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2647, 1991 WL 41010 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

We affirm the conviction and sentence of appellant and certify the following question of great public importance, as we did in Love v. State, 569 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivera v. State
586 So. 2d 1060 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Tucker v. State
576 So. 2d 931 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
576 So. 2d 931, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2647, 1991 WL 41010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiel-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.