Shiel v. State

576 So. 2d 931, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2647, 1991 WL 41010
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 1991·No. No. 90-1239·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

We affirm the conviction and sentence of appellant and certify the following question of great public importance, as we did in Love v. State, 569 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shiel v. State, 576 So. 2d 931, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2647, 1991 WL 41010 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

576 So. 2d 931 (Shiel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. State
586 So. 2d 1060 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Tucker v. State
576 So. 2d 931 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)