Shiebler v. Smith
178 A.D. 925
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1917·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Collusion, the gravamen of the action, not being proved, it is unnecessary at the suit of this plaintiff, to decide the legality of the audit or payment, and the judgment is affirmed, with costs, on authority of Daly v. Haight (170 App. Div. 469). Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shiebler v. Smith, 178 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
178 A.D. 925 (Shiebler v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sebring v. Starner
119 Misc. 651 (New York Supreme Court, 1922)
Stetler v. McFarlane
181 A.D. 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)