Shiebler v. Smith
178 A.D. 925
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 178 A.D. 925 (Shiebler v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shiebler v. Smith, 178 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
Collusion, the gravamen of the action, not being proved, it is unnecessary at the suit of this plaintiff, to decide the legality of the audit or payment, and the judgment is affirmed, with costs, on authority of Daly v. Haight (170 App. Div. 469). Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sebring v. Starner
119 Misc. 651 (New York Supreme Court, 1922)
Stetler v. McFarlane
181 A.D. 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
178 A.D. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiebler-v-smith-nyappdiv-1917.