Shidel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
This text of 1996 Ohio 329 (Shidel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1220.]
SHIDEL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Shidel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1996-Ohio-329.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1664—Submitted October 8, 1996—Decided December 11, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 94 C.A. 114. __________________ Horning & Horning, L.P.A., Richard A. Horning and J. David Horning, for appellants. Oldham & Dowling and Hamilton DeSaussure, Jr., for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1996 Ohio 329, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shidel-v-liberty-mut-ins-co-ohio-1996.