Shiddell v. ELECTRO RUST-PROOFING CORPORATION (NJ)
111 A.2d 527, 17 N.J. 408
This text of 111 A.2d 527 (Shiddell v. ELECTRO RUST-PROOFING CORPORATION (NJ)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shiddell v. ELECTRO RUST-PROOFING CORPORATION (NJ), 111 A.2d 527, 17 N.J. 408 (N.J. 1955).
Opinion
EDWARD B. SHIDDELL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ELECTRO RUST-PROOFING CORPORATION (N.J.), DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Robert L. Hood for the petitioner.
Messrs. Gilhooly, Yauch & Fagan for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shiddell v. Electro Rust-Proofing Corp.
111 A.2d 527 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 A.2d 527, 17 N.J. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shiddell-v-electro-rust-proofing-corporation-nj-nj-1955.