Shick, R., Aplt. v. Clark
This text of Shick, R., Aplt. v. Clark (Shick, R., Aplt. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
RUSSELL SCOTT SHICK, : No. 33 WAP 2017 : Appellant : : v. : MICHAEL R. CLARK, : SUPERINTENDENT, INDIVIDUALLY : AND COLLATERALLY, MELINDA L. : ADAMS, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : CARL FRANZ, DEPUTY : SUPERINTENDENT, INDIVIDUALLY : AND COLLATERALLY, MICHELLE : THARP, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : RONI MARTUCCI, FORMER : GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : DIANE WOODSIDE, DIRECTOR OF : POLICY AND LEGISLATION, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : CHRISTINE ZIRKLE, FORMER CHCA, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : MICHAEL EDWARDS, CHCA, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : VALERIE KUSIAK, FORMER CHCA, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : LISA LINDER, R.N.S., INDIVIDUALLY : AND COLLATERALLY, : : Appellees :
ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, the Notice of Appeal is quashed,
and the Application for Relief and the Application for Leave to Supplement Filing are
denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shick, R., Aplt. v. Clark, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shick-r-aplt-v-clark-pa-2017.