Shick, R., Aplt. v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 26, 2017·No. 33 WAP 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

RUSSELL SCOTT SHICK, : No. 33 WAP 2017 :

Appellant :

:

v. :

MICHAEL R. CLARK, : SUPERINTENDENT, INDIVIDUALLY : AND COLLATERALLY, MELINDA L. : ADAMS, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : CARL FRANZ, DEPUTY : SUPERINTENDENT, INDIVIDUALLY : AND COLLATERALLY, MICHELLE : THARP, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : RONI MARTUCCI, FORMER : GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : DIANE WOODSIDE, DIRECTOR OF : POLICY AND LEGISLATION, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : CHRISTINE ZIRKLE, FORMER CHCA, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : MICHAEL EDWARDS, CHCA, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : VALERIE KUSIAK, FORMER CHCA, : INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLATERALLY, : LISA LINDER, R.N.S., INDIVIDUALLY : AND COLLATERALLY, :

:

Appellees :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, the Notice of Appeal is quashed,

and the Application for Relief and the Application for Leave to Supplement Filing are

denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shick, R., Aplt. v. Clark, (Pa. 2017).

Shick, R., Aplt. v. Clark (Shick, R., Aplt. v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.