Shibley v. McNally

247 A.D. 900

This text of 247 A.D. 900 (Shibley v. McNally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shibley v. McNally, 247 A.D. 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Action to recover for services rendered as a dancing and acrobatic instructor. A jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff as against defendant Thomas F. McNally was set aside and the complaint dismissed. There is ample proof that said defendant obligated himself to pay for the services. Judgment in favor of defendant Thomas F. McNally reversed on the law and the facts, with costs; verdict against defendant Thomas F. McNally reinstated, and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff against said Thomas F. McNally • accordingly, with costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shibley-v-mcnally-nyappdiv-1936.