Shibley v. Hart

295 P. 79, 110 Cal. App. 759, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 52
California Court of Appeal·Decided January 5, 1931·No. Docket No. 7348.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] An application for a writ of mandamus in the above-entitled matter was filed February 6, 1930, and an alternative writ of mandate was granted and made returnable for March 10, 1930. No showing was made on that day, and since that date numerous continuances have been granted upon the request of the petitioner, but to this date the petitioner has failed to appear and has failed to make any showing why a peremptory writ should issue.

It is therefore ordered that for lack of prosecution the proceedings are dismissed and the alternative writ is discharged.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 4, 1931. *Page 761

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shibley v. Hart, 295 P. 79, 110 Cal. App. 759, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 52 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

295 P. 79 (Shibley v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peña de Balbás v. Municipal Court of Mayagüez
48 P.R. 801 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1935)
Peña Vda. de Balbás v. Corte Municipal de Mayagüez
48 P.R. Dec. 820 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1935)