Shi Ping Hong v. Ashcroft
112 F. App'x 989
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 15, 2004·No. No. 03-60688·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The petitioner faded to prove that he is eligible for asylum. The Immigration Judge found no credible evidence that the petitioner suffered past persecution under China’s one-child policy. PETITION DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shi Ping Hong v. Ashcroft, 112 F. App'x 989 (5th Cir. 2004).
112 F. App'x 989 (Shi Ping Hong v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carrillo-Banuelos v. United States
544 U.S. 917 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Faris v. United States
544 U.S. 916 (Supreme Court, 2005)