Shi Ping Hong v. Ashcroft
This text of 112 F. App'x 989 (Shi Ping Hong v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner faded to prove that he is eligible for asylum. The Immigration Judge found no credible evidence that the petitioner suffered past persecution under China’s one-child policy. PETITION DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 F. App'x 989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shi-ping-hong-v-ashcroft-ca5-2004.