Shewman v. Rochester Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shewman v. Rochester Transit Corp.

262 A.D. 812, 28 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5964

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 1941·Published

Opinion

Judgments and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (One judgment is for plaintiff against defendant Rochester Transit Corporation in an action for bus and automobile negligence. The order denies defendant’s motion for a new trial. The other judgment is for defendant Flower City Bakery Supplies, Inc., for no cause of action.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (One judgment is for plaintiff against defendant Rochester Transit Corporation in an action for bus and automobile negligence. The order denies defendant’s motion for a new trial. The other judgment is for defendant Flower City Bakery Supplies, Inc., for no cause of action.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Shewman v. Rochester Transit Corp., 262 A.D. 812, 28 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 812 (Shewman v. Rochester Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.