Shewalter v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railway
This text of 239 U.S. 630 (Shewalter v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of (1) Michigan Central Railroad v. Vreeland, 227 U. S. 59; American Railroad of Porto Rico v. Didricksen, 227 U. S. 145; Gulf, Colorado &c. Ry. v. McGinnis, 228 U. S. 173; Garrett v. Louisville & Nashville R. R., 235 U. S, 308; St. Louis & Iron Mountain Ry. v. Craft, 237 U. S. 648; Kansas City Southern Ry. v. Leslie, 238 U. S. 599; (2) Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Peters, 243; Jack v. Kansas, 199 U. S. 372, 379-380; Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S; 172; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 93.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 U.S. 630, 36 S. Ct. 166, 60 L. Ed. 476, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shewalter-v-carolina-clinchfield-ohio-railway-scotus-1915.