Shevill v. United States
This text of 87 F. 192 (Shevill v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These articles are hollow glass spheres covered with tinsel, and strung, for hanging on Christmas trees, etc., and were assessed as toys, against a protest that they came under paragraph 99, as “glass beads, loose, strung, or carded.” They may not be toys, strictly; but the protest cannot be sustained unless they are “beads,” which are defined to be little perforated [193]*193balls, to be strung on a thread and worn for an ornament. These are too large to come within that definition, and are not to be worn. They do not appear to be beads. Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 F. 192, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shevill-v-united-states-circtsdny-1897.