Shevill v. United States

87 F. 192, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2431

This text of 87 F. 192 (Shevill v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shevill v. United States, 87 F. 192, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2431 (circtsdny 1897).

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

These articles are hollow glass spheres covered with tinsel, and strung, for hanging on Christmas trees, etc., and were assessed as toys, against a protest that they came under paragraph 99, as “glass beads, loose, strung, or carded.” They may not be toys, strictly; but the protest cannot be sustained unless they are “beads,” which are defined to be little perforated [193]*193balls, to be strung on a thread and worn for an ornament. These are too large to come within that definition, and are not to be worn. They do not appear to be beads. Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 F. 192, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shevill-v-united-states-circtsdny-1897.