Sheryll v. L & J Hairstylists of Plainview, Ltd.

272 A.D.2d 603, 709 N.Y.S.2d 429, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6063
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 30, 2000·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated August 2, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for summary judgment. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiff as the party opposing summary judgment (see, Rockowitz v City of New York, 255 AD2d 434; Rosen Furs v Sigma Plumbing & Heating Corp., 249 AD2d 276), and giving her the benefit of every favorable inference (see, Sofair v Levin-Epstein, 231 AD2d 706), the plaintiff established the existence of issues of fact concerning the manner in which the accident occurred, and whether an employee of the defendant negligently contributed thereto. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, S. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheryll v. L & J Hairstylists of Plainview, Ltd., 272 A.D.2d 603, 709 N.Y.S.2d 429, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 603 (Sheryll v. L & J Hairstylists of Plainview, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D.B. v. Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Ctr.
2024 NY Slip Op 33044(U) (New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, 2024)
T.N. v. Great Neck Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ.
2024 NY Slip Op 30777(U) (New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, 2024)
Morette v. Kemper, Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance
35 Misc. 3d 200 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)
Perez v. Exel Logistics, Inc.
278 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)