Sherwood v. Pearl

Supreme Court of Vermont

Sherwood v. Pearl

1 Tyl. 314

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJanuary 15, 1802

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Tyl. 314 (Sherwood v. Pearl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherwood v. Pearl, 1 Tyl. 314 (Vt. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The non est returned upon the writ ©f execution issued upon the judgment rendered in the action of scire facias, may be so far impeached, that the defendant may shew in evidence, that Robert Works, the bail, was of sufficient property to respond the judgment on the 10th of August, 1796, when the writ of execution on the sci. fa. is dated and was issued.

Samuel Miller and Daniel Chipman, for the plaintiff. Ames Marsh and W. C. Harrington, for defendant.

The defendant failing to shew this, a verdict was taken for the plaintiff by consent, subject to the opinion of the Court on the point reserved.

Verdict for plaintiff, 210 dols. 25 cts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The non est returned upon the writ ©f execution issued upon the judgment rendered in the action of scire facias, may be so far impeached, that the defendant may shew in evidence, that Robert Works, the bail, was of sufficient property to respond the judgment on the 10th of August, 1796, when the writ of execution on the sci. fa. is dated and was issued.

Samuel Miller and Daniel Chipman, for the plaintiff. Ames Marsh and W. C. Harrington, for defendant.

The defendant failing to shew this, a verdict was taken for the plaintiff by consent, subject to the opinion of the Court on the point reserved.

Verdict for plaintiff, 210 dols. 25 cts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Tyl. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherwood-v-pearl-vt-1802.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack