Sherwood v. M'Kinney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Sherwood v. M'Kinney

5 Whart. 435, 1840 Pa. LEXIS 231

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 2, 1840

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 5 Whart. 435 (Sherwood v. M'Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherwood v. M'Kinney, 5 Whart. 435, 1840 Pa. LEXIS 231 (Pa. 1840).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is entirely within the principle of Houk v. Knop. There was no neglect of anything that appertained to the official duty of the justice; who had the transcript ready for delivery within the time. Instead of attending to the filing of it in [437]*437his proper person or by his counsel, the appellant committed it to the justice ; and the negligence which ensued was consequently his own- • -

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is entirely within the principle of Houk v. Knop. There was no neglect of anything that appertained to the official duty of the justice; who had the transcript ready for delivery within the time. Instead of attending to the filing of it in [437]*437his proper person or by his counsel, the appellant committed it to the justice ; and the negligence which ensued was consequently his own- • -

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Whart. 435, 1840 Pa. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherwood-v-mkinney-pa-1840.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack