Sherwood v. Galveston Real Estate & Loan Co.

1 White & W. 381
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 1878
DocketNo. 341, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 321
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 381 (Sherwood v. Galveston Real Estate & Loan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherwood v. Galveston Real Estate & Loan Co., 1 White & W. 381 (Tex. Ct. App. 1878).

Opinion

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 694. Appeal bond; independent executors or administrators. The statute [Pas. Dig. art. 1503] which authorizes executors and administrators to appeal without surety has reference to bonded executors and administrators, and not to those who may be administering the trust without bond. The reason why those who are regularly bonded are not required to give security on appeal is that they have already given a bond with security to insure the rightful performance of the trust, and are therefore not required to give security on appeal when prosecuting or defending suits in their representative capacity. When an executor or administrator appeals in his own behalf from a judgment affecting him personally, he undoubtedly must give bond in like manner as any other person appealing from a judgment by which he conceives himself personally aggrieved. [Battle v. Howard, 13 Tex. 348.]

Appeal dismissed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Battle v. Howard
13 Tex. 345 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherwood-v-galveston-real-estate-loan-co-texapp-1878.