Sherwood v. Crane

City of New York Municipal Court

Sherwood v. Crane

9 Misc. 711, 29 N.Y.S. 1149, 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 843

DecidedJune 15, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Misc. 711 (Sherwood v. Crane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherwood v. Crane, 9 Misc. 711, 29 N.Y.S. 1149, 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 843 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Fitzsimons, J.

Was the plaintiffs engagement for the run of the flay only, or was it for the season, which plaintiff says that defendant’s representative stated to her to be for the term from January thirtieth to the following June first.

That is a question of fact and was properly submitted by the trial justice to the jury.

Their finding in plaintiff’s favor upon that question is conclusive and has ample evidence to sustain it. Finding no error we affirm the judgment, with costs.

Newburger, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI