Sherwin v. U.S. Air Force

Fourth Circuit

Sherwin v. U.S. Air Force

37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34872, 1994 WL 551334

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 11, 1994

Docket92-1678

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1495 (Sherwin v. U.S. Air Force) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherwin v. U.S. Air Force, 37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34872, 1994 WL 551334 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles T. SHERWIN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant Appellee, AN and
Ronald G. SPROVERO; Ronald L. Billmyer; A.D. Talley; B.R.
Henderson; Celia Smith; Laverne Harper; M.R. Peters;
Robert Cutrell; Robert Stroebel; Donald Robinson; Jeff
Osborne; Brad Adams; William Waller; R.S. Burrus, Defendants.

No. 92-1678.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted September 20, 1993.
Decided October 11, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-90-34-3-CIV-BR)

Charles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se.

Eileen Coffey Moore, Office of the U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charles T. Sherwin appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant on his complaint alleging a violation of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.A. Sec. 552a (West 1977 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sherwin v. United States Air Force, No. CA-90-34-3-CIV-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles T. SHERWIN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant Appellee, AN and
Ronald G. SPROVERO; Ronald L. Billmyer; A.D. Talley; B.R.
Henderson; Celia Smith; Laverne Harper; M.R. Peters;
Robert Cutrell; Robert Stroebel; Donald Robinson; Jeff
Osborne; Brad Adams; William Waller; R.S. Burrus, Defendants.

No. 92-1678.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted September 20, 1993.
Decided October 11, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-90-34-3-CIV-BR)

Charles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se.

Eileen Coffey Moore, Office of the U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charles T. Sherwin appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant on his complaint alleging a violation of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.A. Sec. 552a (West 1977 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sherwin v. United States Air Force, No. CA-90-34-3-CIV-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34872, 1994 WL 551334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherwin-v-us-air-force-ca4-1994.