Shervis v. State
This text of 874 So. 2d 1282 (Shervis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800 motion, in which he alleges that his sentence is illegal. We affirm the trial court’s denial as to the appellant’s claim for postconviction relief, but reverse that part of the order that prohibits the appellant from further pro se filings, because the trial court failed to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to the allegations levied against him by the trial court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
874 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909, 2004 WL 1362160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shervis-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.