Shervis v. State

874 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909, 2004 WL 1362160
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-0284
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 874 So. 2d 1282 (Shervis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shervis v. State, 874 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909, 2004 WL 1362160 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800 motion, in which he alleges that his sentence is illegal. We affirm the trial court’s denial as to the appellant’s claim for postconviction relief, but reverse that part of the order that prohibits the appellant from further pro se filings, because the trial court failed to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to the allegations levied against him by the trial court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

BOOTH, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deese v. McKinnonville Hunting Club, Inc.
874 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909, 2004 WL 1362160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shervis-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.