Shervis v. State
874 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909, 2004 WL 1362160
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 2004·No. No. 1D04-0284·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The appellant appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800 motion, in which he alleges that his sentence is illegal. We affirm the trial court’s denial as to the appellant’s claim for postconviction relief, but reverse that part of the order that prohibits the appellant from further pro se filings, because the trial court failed to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to the allegations levied against him by the trial court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shervis v. State, 874 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8909, 2004 WL 1362160 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
874 So. 2d 1282 (Shervis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Deese v. McKinnonville Hunting Club, Inc.
874 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)