Sherven v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided April 5, 2023·No. Civil Action No. 2023-0728·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MATTHEW J. SHERVEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-00728 (UNA) ) OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ) NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, ) ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a Complaint, ECF No. 1, and an application to proceed

in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. The Court will grant the application and dismiss this action

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (requiring immediate dismissal of a case upon a

determination that the complaint is frivolous).

Plaintiff is a resident of Mount Horeb, Wisconsin, who has sued the Office of the Director

of National Intelligence (ODNI). He alleges:

The United States Intelligence Community possesses spy satellites that it uses for "targeted signals intelligence gathering". These satellites are used to spy on individual American citizens within the United States. Some of the spy satellites owned by the Intelligence Community are mind-reading satellites. These mind-reading satellites record the radio waves naturally emitted by human brains and feed them to computers running machine learning algorithms that have been trained to decode the thoughts inside of human brains. One of these mind-reading satellites was used to spy on the Plaintiff’s internal thoughts, for four years straight.

Compl. at 1. Plaintiff seeks an order that (1) directs defendant “to stop mind-reading him and rule

that mind-reading violates the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution” and (2) compels defendant

“to hand over all recordings of his internal thoughts to him.” Id. at 2.

1 Complaints premised on fantastic or delusional scenarios or supported wholly by

allegations lacking “an arguable basis either in law or in fact” may be dismissed as frivolous.

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). The instant complaint satisfies this standard and

therefore is dismissed. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

_________/s/____________ TANYA S. CHUTKAN Date: April 5, 2023 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherven v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, (D.D.C. 2023).

Sherven v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (Sherven v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)