Sherry v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Sherry v. Hughes

100 A. 963, 256 Pa. 505, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 645

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 19, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 188

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A. 963 (Sherry v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherry v. Hughes, 100 A. 963, 256 Pa. 505, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 645 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appellee was injured by coming in contact with broken glass in a dark aisle in the establishment of his employers, through which he was compelled to go in obedience to an order of their foreman. He had put the broken glass there the night before, Nut of this the plaintiff was ignorant. The question of the defendants’ negligence was clearly for the jury, and it and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff were submitted to them in a charge free from error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The appellee was injured by coming in contact with broken glass in a dark aisle in the establishment of his employers, through which he was compelled to go in obedience to an order of their foreman. He had put the broken glass there the night before, Nut of this the plaintiff was ignorant. The question of the defendants’ negligence was clearly for the jury, and it and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff were submitted to them in a charge free from error.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A. 963, 256 Pa. 505, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherry-v-hughes-pa-1917.