Sherry Antoinette Smith v. Mohammad Hamid Payandeh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Sherry Antoinette Smith v. Mohammad Hamid Payandeh

DecidedJune 19, 2018

Docket01-18-00463-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Sherry Antoinette Smith v. Mohammad Hamid Payandeh (Sherry Antoinette Smith v. Mohammad Hamid Payandeh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherry Antoinette Smith v. Mohammad Hamid Payandeh, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-18-00463-CV Style: Sherry Antoinette Smith v. Mohammad Hamid Payandeh Date motion filed*: June 14, 2018 Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief Party filing motion: Pro se Appellant Sherry Antoinette Smith Document to be filed: N/A

If motion to extend time: Original due date: N/A Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A Date Requested: N/A (60 days requested)

Ordered that motion is:  Granted in part  Denied (without prejudice)  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Although the court reporter’s June 5, 2018 info sheet states that the reporter’s record has not been filed due to a lack of request and payment by appellant, the clerk’s record has not been filed and is due by July 2, 2018. Accordingly, appellant’s extension request is denied without prejudice to refiling after the clerk’s record and, if requested, the reporter’s records are filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (stating that appellant’s brief will be due 30 days after later of filing of clerk’s or reporter’s record).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley 

Date: June 19, 2018

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-18-00463-CV Style: Sherry Antoinette Smith v. Mohammad Hamid Payandeh Date motion filed*: June 14, 2018 Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief Party filing motion: Pro se Appellant Sherry Antoinette Smith Document to be filed: N/A

If motion to extend time: Original due date: N/A Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A Date Requested: N/A (60 days requested)

Ordered that motion is:  Granted in part  Denied (without prejudice)  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Although the court reporter’s June 5, 2018 info sheet states that the reporter’s record has not been filed due to a lack of request and payment by appellant, the clerk’s record has not been filed and is due by July 2, 2018. Accordingly, appellant’s extension request is denied without prejudice to refiling after the clerk’s record and, if requested, the reporter’s records are filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (stating that appellant’s brief will be due 30 days after later of filing of clerk’s or reporter’s record).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley 

Date: June 19, 2018

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sherry Antoinette Smith v. Mohammad Hamid Payandeh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherry-antoinette-smith-v-mohammad-hamid-payandeh-texapp-2018.