Sherry Anicich v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided April 13, 2017·No. 16-1693·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 13, 2017

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 16‐1693

SHERRY ANICICH, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellant, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 14 C 7125 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., et al., Defendants‐Appellees. Jorge L. Alonso, Judge.

O R D E R

The court hereby AMENDS footnote 4 on page 9 of the slip opinion issued on March 24, 2017, to read as follows:

4 Home Depot asserts in its brief that Illinois businesses employ “thousands” of

such people. We hope this insult to the character of Illinois workers and to the judgment of their managers was just an ill‐advised exaggeration. For its part, Grand frames the case in terms of whether it had an obligation to control Alisha’s behavior. This offensive assumption that the victim’s behavior was the problem is at best flatly contrary to the Rule 12(b)(6) standard.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherry Anicich v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., (7th Cir. 2017).

Sherry Anicich v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Sherry Anicich v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.