Sherrow v. State
852 S.W.2d 431, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 701, 1993 WL 158440
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.
The motion court did not abuse its discretion in denying Defendant’s motion for continuance of his evidentiary hearing because Defendant was not prejudiced by such denial. State v. Schaal, 806 S.W.2d 659, 666 [12] (Mo.banc 1991).
We also determine an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and affirm by order opinion. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided for the parties’ use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sherrow v. State, 852 S.W.2d 431, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 701, 1993 WL 158440 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
852 S.W.2d 431 (Sherrow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Schaal
806 S.W.2d 659 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1991)