Sherrod v. Town of York

Alabama Court of Appeals

Sherrod v. Town of York

144 So. 462, 25 Ala. App. 272, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 213

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 15, 1932

Docket2 Div. 511.

StatusPublished

This text of 144 So. 462 (Sherrod v. Town of York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherrod v. Town of York, 144 So. 462, 25 Ala. App. 272, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 213 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is upon the record, there being-no bill of exceptions.

The purported judgment in the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, cannot be upheld or sustained by any provision known to the law. As the record here ap pears, there is nothing to show how the circuit court acquired jurisdiction of the case. The complaint in the circuit court, containing one count, undertook to charge both a felony and a misdemeanor; the jury returned a general verdict of guilty as charged in the complaint, upon which verdict a so-calleo judgment was rendered. The motion in ar rest of this judgment should have been sustained. James et al. v. State, 104 Ala. 20, 16 So. 94. The action of the court in overruling said motion is made the basis of the assignment of error, and this insistence must be sustained. ■ ’

Notice of appeal was given, in the court below on October 15, 1931, thereby di *273 vesting the lower court of all jurisdiction .thereof; the attempt by the court to have the clerk enter a new judgment in the cause some several months thereafter, and while the cause was pending in this court, was abortive, and such action of the court transmitted here on a separate sheet of paper is no part of the record and cannot be considered. Wells v. State, 19 Ala. App. 404, 97 So. 681; Oliver v. State, ante, p, 34, 140 So. 180.

The judgment appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is upon the record, there being-no bill of exceptions.

The purported judgment in the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, cannot be upheld or sustained by any provision known to the law. As the record here ap pears, there is nothing to show how the circuit court acquired jurisdiction of the case. The complaint in the circuit court, containing one count, undertook to charge both a felony and a misdemeanor; the jury returned a general verdict of guilty as charged in the complaint, upon which verdict a so-calleo judgment was rendered. The motion in ar rest of this judgment should have been sustained. James et al. v. State, 104 Ala. 20, 16 So. 94. The action of the court in overruling said motion is made the basis of the assignment of error, and this insistence must be sustained. ■ ’

Notice of appeal was given, in the court below on October 15, 1931, thereby di *273 vesting the lower court of all jurisdiction .thereof; the attempt by the court to have the clerk enter a new judgment in the cause some several months thereafter, and while the cause was pending in this court, was abortive, and such action of the court transmitted here on a separate sheet of paper is no part of the record and cannot be considered. Wells v. State, 19 Ala. App. 404, 97 So. 681; Oliver v. State, ante, p, 34, 140 So. 180.

The judgment appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 So. 462, 25 Ala. App. 272, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherrod-v-town-of-york-alactapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack