Sherrod v. State
106 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 11872, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 64
This text of 106 So. 3d 949 (Sherrod v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sherrod v. State, 106 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 11872, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 64 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007) (explaining that a trial court should allow amendment of a 3.850 motion for the purpose of correcting a facial deficiency); Henderson v. State, 919 [950]*950So.2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Overton v. State, 976 So.2d 536, 545-46 (Fla.2007).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henderson v. State
919 So. 2d 652 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Overton v. State
976 So. 2d 536 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 11872, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherrod-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.