Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Sherrills v. Fuerst

Sherrills v. Fuerst

671 N.E.2d 1021, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1437, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1861
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 12, 1996
Docket96-2406
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 671 N.E.2d 1021 (Sherrills v. Fuerst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherrills v. Fuerst, 671 N.E.2d 1021, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1437, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1861 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional original actions from Danes Sherrills, unless accompanied by the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Sherrills
741 N.E.2d 145 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 N.E.2d 1021, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1437, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherrills-v-fuerst-ohio-1996.