Sherrill v. Harroff

1999 Ohio 269, 85 Ohio St. 3d 339
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 1999·No. 1998-2651·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 339.]

SHERRILL ET AL., APPELLEES, v. HARROFF, APPELLEE, ET AL.; KNOEDLER, APPELLANT.

[Cite as Sherrill v. Harroff, 1999-Ohio-269.]

Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. Guthrie. (No. 98-2651—Submitted March 9, 1999—Decided April 21, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Columbiana County, No. 96-CO-36.

D. Barry Dickson, for appellee Ronnie Dean Harroff. A. Robert Steiskal, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. Guthrie (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 437, 705 N.E.2d 318. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherrill v. Harroff, 1999 Ohio 269, 85 Ohio St. 3d 339 (Ohio 1999).

1999 Ohio 269 (Sherrill v. Harroff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re K.R.
2010 Ohio 6582 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)