Sherrill v. Harroff

Ohio Supreme Court

Sherrill v. Harroff

1999 Ohio 269, 85 Ohio St. 3d 339

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 21, 1999

Docket1998-2651

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1999 Ohio 269 (Sherrill v. Harroff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherrill v. Harroff, 1999 Ohio 269, 85 Ohio St. 3d 339 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 339.]

SHERRILL ET AL., APPELLEES, v. HARROFF, APPELLEE, ET AL.; KNOEDLER, APPELLANT. [Cite as Sherrill v. Harroff, 1999-Ohio-269.] Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. Guthrie. (No. 98-2651—Submitted March 9, 1999—Decided April 21, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Columbiana County, No. 96-CO-36. __________________ D. Barry Dickson, for appellee Ronnie Dean Harroff. A. Robert Steiskal, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. Guthrie (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 437, 705 N.E.2d 318. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 339.]

SHERRILL ET AL., APPELLEES, v. HARROFF, APPELLEE, ET AL.; KNOEDLER, APPELLANT. [Cite as Sherrill v. Harroff, 1999-Ohio-269.] Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. Guthrie. (No. 98-2651—Submitted March 9, 1999—Decided April 21, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Columbiana County, No. 96-CO-36. __________________ D. Barry Dickson, for appellee Ronnie Dean Harroff. A. Robert Steiskal, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. Guthrie (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 437, 705 N.E.2d 318. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 269, 85 Ohio St. 3d 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherrill-v-harroff-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack