Sherri Seay and Michael Seay v. Barnett Gathering, LP
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-360-CV
SHERRI SEAY AND MICHAEL SEAY APPELLANTS
V.
BARNETT GATHERING, LP APPELLEE
----------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT
We have considered AAppellants= Motion To Dismiss Due To Settlement,@
requesting that we dismiss the appeal with prejudice. It is the court=s opinion that
the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal with prejudice.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which
let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY and GARDNER, JJ.; and DIXON W. HOLMAN (Senior Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment).
DELIVERED: July 29, 2010
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sherri Seay and Michael Seay v. Barnett Gathering, LP (Sherri Seay and Michael Seay v. Barnett Gathering, LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.