SHERRELL C. TOWNS v. JEFFREY WEHKING

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedDecember 1, 2025
Docket3:25-cv-00042
StatusUnknown

This text of SHERRELL C. TOWNS v. JEFFREY WEHKING (SHERRELL C. TOWNS v. JEFFREY WEHKING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SHERRELL C. TOWNS v. JEFFREY WEHKING, (S.D. Ill. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SHERRELL C. TOWNS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 25-CV-00042-SPM

JEFFREY WEHKING,

Respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL

McGLYNN, District Judge: Before the Court is Petitioner Towns’ Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 57) and Motion to Strike the Record in Madison County After May 21, 2025, Hearing (Doc. 58). In his Motion for Default Judgment, Towns asserts that the failure of Respondent’s previous counsel to withdraw from the matter, as well as the current counsel’s failure to enter an appearance, places Respondent Wehking in default. (See Doc. 57). Upon a review of the record, this Court does not find any unauthorized filings by Respondent nor any errors in the record with respect to counsel for Respondent having entered their appearances. Moreover, this Court does not find that Respondent has failed to timely respond to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Accordingly, the Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. In his Motion to Strike, Petitioner Towns asks this Court to strike entries made on the record after this Court’s Order entered on September 4, 2025, in his current proceedings before the Circuit Court for Madison County, Illinois. (See Doc. 58). Towns states that further developments in his postconviction matter in Madison County case only serve as a detriment to him in the matter pending before this Court. The Court finds that it is without jurisdiction to alter the docket in the proceedings before the Madison County Circuit Court and grant Petitioner the relief he seeks. See generally FreeEats.com, Inc. v. Indiana, 502 F.3d 590, 595 (7th Cir. 2007) (stating that the

abstention doctrine announced by the Supreme Court in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) “is designed to permit state courts to try state cases free from interference by federal courts”). Accordingly, the Motion to Strike is DENIED. In addition, this Court has sua sponte conducted a review of the docket and carefully considered the importance of the issues presented and the unique procedural posture of this case. The Court finds that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§3006A(a)(2)(B), the interests of justice require appointment of counsel for the Petitioner Sherrell C. Towns. It is the finding of the Court that the Petitioner is financially unable to obtain counsel, is in need of counsel, and is entitled to the appointment of counsel. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings in the District Court, and the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §3006A, the Court appoints CJA Panel Attorney, Tory D. Bernsen, of Dowd Bernsen, LLC, PO Box 220126, St. Louis, MO 63122 to represent

Petitioner Sherrell C. Towns. In light of the foregoing, the Court hereby STAYS Respondent Jeffrey Wehking’s deadline to file an Answer to Petitioner Towns’ Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court will set a status conference for this matter by separate order to determine whether Petitioner Towns intends to file an amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus or otherwise set a briefing schedule to move this matter forward as expeditiously as possible. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 1, 2025

s/ Stephen P. McGlynn STEPHEN P. McGLYNN U.S. District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Younger v. Harris
401 U.S. 37 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Freeeats. Com, Inc. v. Indiana
502 F.3d 590 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SHERRELL C. TOWNS v. JEFFREY WEHKING, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherrell-c-towns-v-jeffrey-wehking-ilsd-2025.