Sherr v. Board of Elections in the City of New York

S.D. New York

Sherr v. Board of Elections in the City of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 2023

Docket1:23-cv-08693

StatusUnknown

This text of Sherr v. Board of Elections in the City of New York (Sherr v. Board of Elections in the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherr v. Board of Elections in the City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

eae Week? DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ——_—_—_ DATE FILED; 12/20/2023 Brandon D. Sherr, Plaintiff, 1:23-cv-08693 (JLR) (SDA) -against- ORDER Board of Elections in the City of New York, Defendant.

STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge: Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss having been referred to the undersigned for a Report and Recommendation (see Referral Order, ECF No. 24), the Court intends to consider together Defendant’s motion to dismiss and Plaintiff's motion to certify a collective action.* See, e.g., Uraga v. Amici 519 LLC, No. 17-CV-03547 (ALC), 2018 WL 3579850, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2018) (noting that motion to dismiss and motion for conditional certification were “more efficiently decided in one order” given overlapping arguments); Deas v. Alba Carting & Demolition Inc., No. 17-CV-03947 (RA), 2018 WL 11409286, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2018) (deciding motions in single order); Chen v. Major League Baseball, 6 F. Supp. 3d 449, 451 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (same), aff'd sub nom. Chen v. Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., 798 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2015).

+ “Orders authorizing notice are often referred to as orders ‘certifying’ a collective action, even though the [Fair Labor Standards Act] does not contain a certification requirement.” Guillen v. Marshalls of MA, Inc., 750 F. Supp. 2d 469, 475 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).

Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered that, no later than January 2, 2024, the parties shall file a proposed briefing schedule for the remainder of the briefing on both motions or, if the parties cannot agree, their respective proposals regarding the briefing schedule. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York December 20, 2023

STEWART D. AARON United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

eae Week? DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ——_—_—_ DATE FILED; 12/20/2023 Brandon D. Sherr, Plaintiff, 1:23-cv-08693 (JLR) (SDA) -against- ORDER Board of Elections in the City of New York, Defendant.

STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge: Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss having been referred to the undersigned for a Report and Recommendation (see Referral Order, ECF No. 24), the Court intends to consider together Defendant’s motion to dismiss and Plaintiff's motion to certify a collective action.* See, e.g., Uraga v. Amici 519 LLC, No. 17-CV-03547 (ALC), 2018 WL 3579850, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2018) (noting that motion to dismiss and motion for conditional certification were “more efficiently decided in one order” given overlapping arguments); Deas v. Alba Carting & Demolition Inc., No. 17-CV-03947 (RA), 2018 WL 11409286, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2018) (deciding motions in single order); Chen v. Major League Baseball, 6 F. Supp. 3d 449, 451 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (same), aff'd sub nom. Chen v. Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., 798 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2015).

+ “Orders authorizing notice are often referred to as orders ‘certifying’ a collective action, even though the [Fair Labor Standards Act] does not contain a certification requirement.” Guillen v. Marshalls of MA, Inc., 750 F. Supp. 2d 469, 475 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).

Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered that, no later than January 2, 2024, the parties shall file a proposed briefing schedule for the remainder of the briefing on both motions or, if the parties cannot agree, their respective proposals regarding the briefing schedule. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York December 20, 2023

STEWART D. AARON United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sherr v. Board of Elections in the City of New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherr-v-board-of-elections-in-the-city-of-new-york-nysd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack