Sherman v. Vervena

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Sherman v. Vervena

7 R.I. Dec. 98

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 10, 1931

DocketNo. 84504

StatusPublished

This text of 7 R.I. Dec. 98 (Sherman v. Vervena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. Vervena, 7 R.I. Dec. 98 (R.I. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon demurrer of defendant to fourth count of declaration.

The fourth count is based upon the theory that the defendant was bound to know that a loaded gun kept by him upon his premises was an attractive nuisance.

The first ground of demurrer is that the attractive nuisance doctrine is not law in the State of Rhode Island.

Demurrer to fourth count sustained, Paolino vs. McKendall, 24 R. I. 432.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon demurrer of defendant to fourth count of declaration.

The fourth count is based upon the theory that the defendant was bound to know that a loaded gun kept by him upon his premises was an attractive nuisance.

The first ground of demurrer is that the attractive nuisance doctrine is not law in the State of Rhode Island.

Demurrer to fourth count sustained, Paolino vs. McKendall, 24 R. I. 432.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 R.I. Dec. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-vervena-risuperct-1931.