Sherman v. Vervena

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Sherman v. Vervena

7 R.I. Dec. 98

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 10, 1931·No. No. 84504·Published

Opinion

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon demurrer of defendant to fourth count of declaration.

The fourth count is based upon the theory that the defendant was bound to know that a loaded gun kept by him upon his premises was an attractive nuisance.

The first ground of demurrer is that the attractive nuisance doctrine is not law in the State of Rhode Island.

Demurrer to fourth count sustained, Paolino vs. McKendall, 24 R. I. 432.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon demurrer of defendant to fourth count of declaration.

The fourth count is based upon the theory that the defendant was bound to know that a loaded gun kept by him upon his premises was an attractive nuisance.

The first ground of demurrer is that the attractive nuisance doctrine is not law in the State of Rhode Island.

Demurrer to fourth count sustained, Paolino vs. McKendall, 24 R. I. 432.

Sherman v. Vervena, 7 R.I. Dec. 98 (R.I. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

7 R.I. Dec. 98 (Sherman v. Vervena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.