Sherman v. State

56 S.W.2d 1078

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sherman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Tex. Crim. 273 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 8, 1933·No. No. 15667·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for malicious mischief, punishment assessed being a fine of $10.

The prosecution was under article 1373, P. C. (1925). The complaint and information alleged that appellant willfully wounded ai •horse owned by W. I-L Lester by shooting said horse with a gun with the intent to injure the owner.

We observe no errors of a fundamental character. The record is before us without statement of facts or) bills of exception. In, such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for malicious mischief, punishment assessed being a fine of $10.

We observe no errors of a fundamental character. The record is before us without statement of facts or) bills of exception. In, such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed. '

Sherman v. State, 56 S.W.2d 1078 (Tex. 1933).

Pincite

56 S.W.2d 1078 (Sherman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.