Sherman v. State

1915 OK CR 190, 151 P. 486, 12 Okla. Crim. 16, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 188
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 13, 1915
DocketNo. A-2083.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1915 OK CR 190 (Sherman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherman v. State, 1915 OK CR 190, 151 P. 486, 12 Okla. Crim. 16, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 188 (Okla. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

The plaintiff in error, Charley Sherman, was convicted at the February, 1913, term of the District Court of Noble county on a charge of incest, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of ten years.

The attorney general has filed a confession in error in this cause, based upon the ground that there is no competent evidence in the record upon which to base a judgment of conviction. A careful examination of the record by the court discloses the correctness of the attorney general’s position. The confession in error is therefore sustained.

No good purpose could be served by a discussion of the errors assigned. The judgment is reversed upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to justify the conviction.

DOYLE, P. J., concurs; EURMAN, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Couch v. City of Tulsa
1952 OK CR 138 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1915 OK CR 190, 151 P. 486, 12 Okla. Crim. 16, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1915.