Sherman v. State

160 So. 3d 494, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2915, 2015 WL 890364
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 2015
DocketNo. 1D13-4464
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 160 So. 3d 494 (Sherman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherman v. State, 160 So. 3d 494, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2915, 2015 WL 890364 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm based on State v. Murphy, 124 So.3d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), Elsberry v. State, 130 So.3d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), and Cantrell v. State, 132 So.3d 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), and note that the Florida Supreme Court has granted review of the conflict between the district courts. See No. SC14-755, 2014 WL 3360176 (Fla.2014).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BENTON, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyler Sherman v. State of Florida
272 So. 3d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 3d 494, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2915, 2015 WL 890364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.