Sherman v. State

160 So. 3d 494, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2915, 2015 WL 890364
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 2015·No. No. 1D13-4464·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm based on State v. Murphy, 124 So.3d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), Elsberry v. State, 130 So.3d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), and Cantrell v. State, 132 So.3d 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), and note that the Florida Supreme Court has granted review of the conflict between the district courts. See No. SC14-755, 2014 WL 3360176 (Fla.2014).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BENTON, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherman v. State, 160 So. 3d 494, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2915, 2015 WL 890364 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

160 So. 3d 494 (Sherman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tyler Sherman v. State of Florida
272 So. 3d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)