Sherman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sherman v. State

451 So. 2d 1027, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13881

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 1984

DocketNo. 83-2524

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 451 So. 2d 1027 (Sherman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. State, 451 So. 2d 1027, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13881 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

DANAHY, Judge.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal in this case, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and, therefore, the order withholding adjudication of guilt and placing appellant on probation appealed from is affirmed. At sentencing in open court the court orally pronounced a term of probation for a period of two years. However, the written order provides for a three-year period of probation. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court for correction of the apparent clerical error in the order of probation. Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla.2d DCA 1983).

The order is AFFIRMED in all other respects.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DANAHY, Judge.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal in this case, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and, therefore, the order withholding adjudication of guilt and placing appellant on probation appealed from is affirmed. At sentencing in open court the court orally pronounced a term of probation for a period of two years. However, the written order provides for a three-year period of probation. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court for correction of the apparent clerical error in the order of probation. Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla.2d DCA 1983).

The order is AFFIRMED in all other respects.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

451 So. 2d 1027, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack