Sherman v. Stafford Manufacturing Co.

51 A. 48, 23 R.I. 529, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 137
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 24, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

(1) The court is of opinion that there is no evidence to show negligence on the part of the defendant, or due care on the part of the deceased. The testimony relied on by the plaintiff for that purpose is the statement made to him by the deceased, which is hearsay, and which was only admitted for the purpose of giving the whole of a conversa *530 tion relating to statements against interest. While the whole admission, embracing favorable and unfavorable parts, may be given, the rule allowing it does not .extend to matters distinct from the admissions, nor enable a party, under the guise of giving the whole statement, to introduce other statements which amount only to hearsay testimony upon other points. 1 Gr. on Ev. § 201 (16th Ed.); 1 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law (2nd Ed.), p. 721. Such was the character of the evidence given by the plaintiff; but, even taking it as it stands, it fails to make out the case.

Franklin P. Owen, for plaintiff. Ballou & Tower, for defendant.

Petition for new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherman v. Stafford Manufacturing Co., 51 A. 48, 23 R.I. 529, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 137 (R.I. 1902).

51 A. 48 (Sherman v. Stafford Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Howard
99 A. 236 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1916)