Sherman v. Sherman

New York Court of Appeals

Sherman v. Sherman

7 N.Y.2d 1032, 200 N.Y.S.2d 419

DecidedMarch 31, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.Y.2d 1032 (Sherman v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. Sherman, 7 N.Y.2d 1032, 200 N.Y.S.2d 419 (N.Y. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

*1034 Concur: Judges Dye, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld and Bubke dissent from so much of the judgment as grants defendant a separation on his counterclaims and vote to reverse the judgment to that extent and to dismiss defendant’s counterclaims upon the ground that the record fails to establish cruel and inhuman treatment of defendant by plaintiff. (See, e.g., Russ v. Russ, 4 F Y 2d 743, affg. 3 A D 2d 888.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

*1034 Concur: Judges Dye, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld and Bubke dissent from so much of the judgment as grants defendant a separation on his counterclaims and vote to reverse the judgment to that extent and to dismiss defendant’s counterclaims upon the ground that the record fails to establish cruel and inhuman treatment of defendant by plaintiff. (See, e.g., Russ v. Russ, 4 F Y 2d 743, affg. 3 A D 2d 888.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.Y.2d 1032, 200 N.Y.S.2d 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-sherman-ny-1960.