Sherman v. Sherman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sherman v. Sherman

192 A. 59, 121 N.J. Eq. 614, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 564

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A. 59 (Sherman v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. Sherman, 192 A. 59, 121 N.J. Eq. 614, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 564 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

•The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. It is apparent therefrom that the order appealed from vacating the preliminary restraint was a proper exercise of a sound judicial discretion.

The order is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

•The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. It is apparent therefrom that the order appealed from vacating the preliminary restraint was a proper exercise of a sound judicial discretion.

The order is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A. 59, 121 N.J. Eq. 614, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-sherman-nj-1937.