Sherman v. Sherman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sherman v. Sherman

192 A. 59, 121 N.J. Eq. 614, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 564

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 30, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

•The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. It is apparent therefrom that the order appealed from vacating the preliminary restraint was a proper exercise of a sound judicial discretion.

The order is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

•The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. It is apparent therefrom that the order appealed from vacating the preliminary restraint was a proper exercise of a sound judicial discretion.

The order is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.

Sherman v. Sherman, 192 A. 59, 121 N.J. Eq. 614, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 564 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

192 A. 59 (Sherman v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.