Sherman v. Sherman

Michigan Supreme Court

Sherman v. Sherman

232 Mich. 657

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 22, 1925

DocketDocket No. 71

StatusPublished

This text of 232 Mich. 657 (Sherman v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. Sherman, 232 Mich. 657 (Mich. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, J.

Plaintiff declared on a promissory note for $700 and had judgment in a trial without a jury. Defendants bring error. The record shows no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed. There is nothing we can review. It was held in Robbins v. Simons Sales Co., 218 Mich. 569, quoting syllabus:

“In an action tried before the court without a jury, where there was no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed, under the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12586) and the rule (Circuit

[658]*658Court Rule No. 45), the record presents no question which the Supreme Court can review on a writ of error.”

Judgment affirmed.

McDonald, C. J., and Bird, Sharpe, Moore, Steere, Fellows, and Wiest, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, J.

Plaintiff declared on a promissory note for $700 and had judgment in a trial without a jury. Defendants bring error. The record shows no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed. There is nothing we can review. It was held in Robbins v. Simons Sales Co., 218 Mich. 569, quoting syllabus:

“In an action tried before the court without a jury, where there was no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed, under the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12586) and the rule (Circuit

[658]*658Court Rule No. 45), the record presents no question which the Supreme Court can review on a writ of error.”

Judgment affirmed.

McDonald, C. J., and Bird, Sharpe, Moore, Steere, Fellows, and Wiest, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 Mich. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-sherman-mich-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack