Sherman v. Proprietors of Connecticut River Bridge

11 Mass. 338
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 11 Mass. 338 (Sherman v. Proprietors of Connecticut River Bridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherman v. Proprietors of Connecticut River Bridge, 11 Mass. 338 (Mass. 1814).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The first corporation was dead, and the new one was created for the same purpose and object. The writ was served on the clerk of the existing corporation, by which regular notice was given the real proprietors of the bridge. This is, then, the common case of a misnomer. The amendment may be made, on the common rule of an election by the defendants of the costs of the action to this time, or a continuance,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hennessey v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.
65 Mass. App. Ct. 88 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2005)
Gans v. Beasley
59 N.W. 714 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
Hoffield v. Board of Education
33 Kan. 644 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1885)
Kimball & Austin Manufacturing Co. v. Vroman
35 Mich. 310 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1877)
Noblet v. Ohio & M. R.
18 F. Cas. 282 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1876)
Smith v. Tallassee Branch of Central Plank-Road Co.
30 Ala. 650 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)
Cartwright v. Chabert
3 Tex. 261 (Texas Supreme Court, 1848)
Heckscher v. Binney
11 F. Cas. 1016 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1847)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Mass. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-proprietors-of-connecticut-river-bridge-mass-1814.