Sherman v. Pollack
110 A.D.2d 833, 488 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48733
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[834] It is undisputed that defendant was not the physician who treated plaintiff Karen Sherman on April 16, 1979, the date upon which the acts occurred which allegedly constitute the basis for the malpractice claim. Further, plaintiffs have not set forth any facts upon which defendant may be held vicariously liable for the actions of the physician who allegedly treated plaintiff Karen Sherman on April 16, 1979.
Under these circumstances, dismissal of the complaint is warranted. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sherman v. Pollack, 110 A.D.2d 833, 488 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 833 (Sherman v. Pollack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reeck v. Huntington Hospital
215 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)